Grey Ratsnake

ALTO HSR · Flora & Fauna · Grey Ratsnake

The Southern Route Would Run Through Protected Snake Habitat

— and that’s a problem that can’t be mitigated away

Research by Lindsay Davidson and Rena Upitis Updated February 2026 Reflects Bill 5, June 2025

Grey Ratsnake (Pantherophis spiloides) in the Frontenac Arch — federally Threatened species
Grey Ratsnake (Pantherophis spiloides) — Threatened under SARA & Ontario ESA Photo: L. Davidson
⚠ Ontario Law Has Changed — June 2025. Ontario’s Bill 5 significantly weakened the provincial Endangered Species Act — narrowing habitat definitions, removing harassment protections, and letting the government override independent scientific advice. Bill 5
But federal law — the Species at Risk Act (SARA) — is completely unchanged. SARA is the main legal barrier to the Southern Route, and no Ontario legislation can touch it. SARA
The Short Version. The southern route would pass through the heart of the Frontenac Arch Biosphere Reserve — a UNESCO-protected area and the legally defined critical habitat of the grey ratsnake, a federally Threatened species. The snake’s protected habitat runs from Highway 7 in the north to the St. Lawrence River in the south. The southern route goes straight through the middle. Bill 5 reduced some provincial protections — but it changed nothing about federal law, the geography, or the biology. The problems with this route are the same as before, and fencing won’t fix them.
Why It Matters
This isn’t really about one snake

The grey ratsnake is easy to frame as one species in a cost-benefit calculation. But that’s not how ecosystems work. As a large predator, it keeps small mammal populations in check — including rodents that carry Lyme disease. It’s an indicator species: where it survives, the broader web of life is also intact.

The Frontenac Arch it lives in is described by the Nature Conservancy of Canada as one of the most important forest corridors east of the Rocky Mountains. NCC The Frontenac Axis population of the grey ratsnake exists nowhere else on Earth — it can’t be relocated or replaced. Canada committed under the Kunming-Montreal Biodiversity Framework (2022) to halt species loss. That commitment doesn’t disappear because Ontario changed its provincial rules.

The question isn’t whether a snake matters more than a train. It’s whether a major infrastructure project can be designed to avoid destroying something irreplaceable — when a route exists that does exactly that.

About the Grey Ratsnake
Canada’s largest snake — and one of its most fragile

Federally listed as Threatened since 2009, the grey ratsnake’s vulnerability isn’t just about its rarity — it’s about its biology. It’s slow to reproduce and deeply tied to specific places. SARA Recovery Strategy

Doesn’t breed until age 7

Most reptiles mature faster. This species can’t bounce back from losses — every adult death counts.

Reproduces every 2–3 years

A population losing adults faster than it replaces them is on a one-way path. There’s no biological buffer.

Returns to the same spots every year

Snakes come back to the same hibernation sites and nesting spots year after year. Destroy a site and those snakes are gone.

Hibernates in groups

Dozens share one rocky outcrop through winter. Losing a single hibernaculum can wipe out an entire local population. COSSARO 2020

“Because of their slow growth and reproduction at northern latitudes, the death of even a small number of adults on roads each year can cause population declines.” — SARA Recovery Strategy
Habitat — Where It Lives
The route goes straight through the protected zone
The legal boundary

Under federal law, the grey ratsnake’s critical habitat is the area “roughly bordered by Highway 7 in the north, the St. Lawrence River in the south, Highway 38 in the west and Highway 29 in the east.” The southern ALTO corridor runs directly through the middle of this zone. Ontario’s Bill 5 does not change these federal boundaries. Federal Recovery Strategy

The Frontenac Arch Biosphere Reserve

Canada designated the Frontenac Arch as a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve in 2002 — 220,973 hectares from Kingston to Brockville and north to Perth. The grey ratsnake is a characteristic threatened species of the Biosphere. A rail line through its core wouldn’t just harm snakes — it could put the UNESCO designation at risk, and with it the conservation economy the region has built around it. UNESCO MAB

Bill 5 — What Changed and What Didn’t
Ontario weakened the rules. Federal law is untouched.

Some argue that Bill 5’s weaker provincial rules make the southern route more viable. That’s not correct — the provincial ESA was never the main legal barrier. Federal SARA is. Norton Rose Fulbright analysis

Ontario Changed — Weaker Now
  • Habitat definition narrowed — movement corridors less protected
  • Harassment removed from prohibited activities
  • Full permits replaced by online registration
  • Government can override independent scientific listings
  • Species Conservation Fund being wound down
Federal SARA — Still in Force
  • Federal critical habitat boundaries unchanged
  • SARA s.58 — can’t destroy critical habitat
  • SARA s.79 — must prove no reasonable alternative exists
  • Federal Threatened listing for grey ratsnake
  • UNESCO Biosphere Reserve obligations
The key point: SARA s.79 requires showing no reasonable alternative exists before approving a project through Threatened species habitat. As long as other route options exist that avoid the Frontenac Arch, the southern route can’t clear that bar — and Bill 5 doesn’t change that. Ontario Nature: SARA vs. ESA
The Real Problems with This Route
Five things that can’t be fixed with mitigation

1. It goes through the protected zone — there’s no way around that

The entire southern corridor sits between Highway 7 and the St. Lawrence — that’s the federally defined critical habitat. Any route within this corridor is automatically in the protected zone. Federal Recovery Strategy

3. It cuts the corridor in two — forever

Grey ratsnakes travel up to 4 km between winter and summer habitat. A rail line through the narrowest point of the Frontenac Arch would permanently split the population. Snakes on one side can’t reach snakes on the other — a serious long-term threat to the species’ survival. Recovery Strategy

4. Trains at 300 km/h give snakes zero chance

Road mortality is already the single biggest threat to this population. Cars are bad enough. A 300 km/h train? Zero reaction time. Add frequent service and mandatory safety fencing that blocks movement year-round, and you’ve built a machine designed to eliminate snakes from a landscape. SARA Recovery Strategy

5. Fencing and ecopassages won’t work here

Snake-proof fencing needs intense yearly maintenance over its entire length. This route would need 100+ km of it through remote wilderness, connecting dozens of scattered rocky outcrop hibernacula. A Highway 69 study found snake road abundance was actually higher after mitigation was installed. The terrain makes this practically impossible. SARA Recovery Strategy — Hwy 69

What We’re Asking For
Six things ALTO should do
1

Reject the southern corridor

This corridor can’t be reconciled with federal law, UNESCO obligations, or basic conservation biology. It needs to come off the table entirely. SARA s.58, s.79

2

Look seriously at routes that avoid the Biosphere

Federal law requires genuinely exploring alternatives before approving a route through Threatened species habitat. That means corridors not currently on the table too. SARA s.79

3

Don’t use Bill 5 as an excuse

Federal SARA is what matters here, and Ontario law can’t change it. Weaker provincial rules make federal compliance more important, not less. OKT Law analysis

4

Do the environmental assessment before choosing a route

A proper assessment of impacts on grey ratsnake and other species needs to happen before route selection — not as an afterthought. SARA Public Registry

5

Bring in conservation groups and Indigenous communities

Real consultation must include the Frontenac Arch Biosphere Network , Nature Conservancy of Canada , species at risk recovery teams, and Indigenous communities with traditional territories in the area.

6

Watch what happens with the new provincial regulations

The Species Conservation Act, 2025 regulations aren’t finalized yet. Stakeholders should stay engaged with the Environmental Registry to make sure grey ratsnake habitat is protected under the new rules. ERO #025-0909

Bottom Line
The law hasn’t changed where it counts. Neither has the biology.
  • The southern corridor still runs through the core of federally protected grey ratsnake critical habitat.
  • Federal SARA still requires proof that no reasonable alternative exists — and other options do exist.
  • No route through the Frontenac Arch Biosphere Reserve can be reconciled with Canada’s conservation obligations, regardless of what Ontario’s provincial rules say.

The southern corridor must be rejected. ALTO should find a route that doesn’t run through one of Canada’s most important protected ecological corridors.

Sources
8Ontario Legislature — Bill 5, 2025; ERO #025-0380; #025-0909
9Norton Rose Fulbright — Bill 5 analysis
10Ontario Nature — SARA vs. ESA; OKT Law — ESA repeal analysis
11Colley et al. (2017). Mitigation reduces road mortality of a threatened rattlesnake. Wildlife Research 44(1)

Research by Lindsay Davidson and Rena Upitis. Facilitated with AI tools with human review and revision. Legislative information current as of February 2026.