Political Positions

ALTO HSR Citizen Research Initiative

Political & Governmental Positions on ALTO High-Speed Rail

Published positions of federal Members of Parliament, Members of Provincial Parliament, and municipal councils on the ALTO HSR project and its proposed southern corridor.


Opposition to the proposed ALTO High-Speed Railway is gaining momentum across Eastern Ontario. The following tables collate published statements and formal council motions from elected representatives at the federal, provincial, and municipal levels. Source data compiled by Save South Frontenac; information current as of March 18, 2026.

Position key: Opposes Active opposition to the current plan Concerns Expressed concerns, no formal opposition Conditional Supports a different configuration or stop Pending Motion or statement in progress No Statement No public position as of March 18, 2026
Federal — Members of Parliament
Name / RidingPositionStatement / Detail
Michael Barrett
Leeds-Grenville-Thousand Islands-Rideau Lakes
OpposesMedia release, Feb. 27. Opposes the federal Alto HSR project.
Bruce Fanjoy
Carleton
No StatementNo formal statement as of March 18, 2026.
Mark Gerretsen
Kingston and the Islands
ConcernsDemands Kingston stop/high-speed rail line as currently configured. News article, Feb. 12.
Emma Harrison
Peterborough
No StatementNo formal statement as of March 18, 2026.
Shelby Kramp-Neuman
Hastings-Lennox & Addington-Tyendinaga
OpposesStatement released, Feb. 25.
Phillip Lawrence
Northumberland-Clarke
ConcernsExpressed concerns in the House of Commons (video), Feb. 23.
Chris Malette
Bay of Quinte
OpposesWithholds support for proposed southern route. Statement released, Feb. 27.
Scott Reid
Lanark-Frontenac
Opposes“Let’s Stop Alto” — article on representative’s website, Feb. 13.
Provincial — Members of Provincial Parliament
Name / RidingPositionStatement / Detail
Doug Ford
Premier of Ontario
ConditionalWants high-speed rail built along the Hwy 401 corridor, not the southern route. CTV News, March 16.
Tyler Allsopp
Bay of Quinte
No StatementNo formal statement as of March 18, 2026.
Ric Bresee
Hastings-Lennox & Addington
No StatementNo formal statement as of March 18, 2026.
Steve Clark
Leeds-Grenville-Thousand Islands-Rideau Lakes
OpposesOpposes the proposed southern route. Statement released, Feb. 27.
George Darouze
Carleton
No StatementNo formal statement as of March 18, 2026.
John Jordan
Lanark-Frontenac
No StatementNo formal statement as of March 18, 2026.
Ted Hsu
Kingston and the Islands
ConcernsStatement released, Feb. 13.
David Piccini
Northumberland-Peterborough South
No StatementNo public statement as of March 18, 2026.
Municipal Councils
MunicipalityPositionStatement / Detail
Township of Addington Highlands
OpposesCouncil adopted a formal submission and motion opposing the ALTO HSR project, March 12. Goes beyond route opposition to urge the federal government to “take a step back and rethink the proposal.” Cites corridor bisection of communities, expropriation process changes, and project cost.
Township of Asphodel-Norwood
No StatementNo formal statement as of March 18, 2026.
Township of Beckwith
OpposesReeve’s message, March 6.
City of Belleville
OpposesMotion passed by council, Feb. 23.
City of Brockville
OpposesAmended motion passed by council, March 10.
Town of Carleton Place
No StatementNo formal statement as of March 18, 2026.
Township of Central Frontenac
OpposesMotion 2026-63 passed by council, Feb. 10.
Municipality of Centre Hastings
ConditionalAdvocates for a Madoc-area high-speed rail station. Article on municipal website, Feb. 3.
Township of Douro-Dummer
No StatementNo formal statement as of March 18, 2026.
Township of Drummond/North Elmsley
OpposesAnnouncement on municipal website, March 10.
Township of Elizabethtown-Kitley
No StatementNo formal statement as of March 18, 2026.
Township of Faraday
OpposesMotion passed by council, Feb. 4.
Town of Greater Napanee
No StatementNo formal statement as of March 18, 2026.
Township of Havelock-Belmont-Methuen
OpposesMayor’s statement, March 2.
Township of Lanark Highlands
OpposesCommittee of the Whole passed motion March 10 that the Township does not support the Alto HSR project, and supports reinvestment in existing rail infrastructure. Prompted in part by correspondence from MP Scott Reid.
City of Kingston
OpposesJoint statement with Township of South Frontenac, March 9.
Township of Madoc
No StatementNo formal statement as of March 18, 2026.
Municipality of Marmora and Lake
No StatementNo formal statement as of March 18, 2026.
Township of Merrickville-Wolford
No StatementNo formal statement as of March 18, 2026.
Municipality of Mississippi Mills
No StatementNo formal statement as of March 18, 2026.
Township of North Frontenac
OpposesMotion passed by council, Feb. 6.
Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan
No StatementNo formal statement as of March 18, 2026.
City of Peterborough
ConcernsNotice on municipal website monitoring the project and its implications.
Town of Perth
OpposesMotion announced in news article, March 12.
City of Quinte West
PendingALTO resolution on agenda for March 18 meeting.
Township of Rideau Lakes
OpposesMotion passed by council, Feb. 9.
Town of Smiths Falls
ConditionalHired a consultant to build a business case for a station in Smiths Falls. March 2026.
Township of South Frontenac
OpposesMotion passed by council, Feb. 3. Joint statement with City of Kingston, March 9.
Township of Stirling-Rawdon
No StatementNo formal statement as of March 18, 2026.
Township of Stone Mills
OpposesMotion passed by council, Feb. 9.
Township of Tay Valley
OpposesCouncil passed a motion of “total opposition” to the proposed HSR project through eastern Ontario, March 24. Motion was unanimous; gallery applauded at the close of debate. Reeve Rainer: “The negative consequences are so severe. I just can’t see any benefit.” Resolution to be circulated to the same recipients as the Eastern Ontario Wardens’ Caucus motion.
Municipality of Trent Hills
OpposesMedia release, Feb. 26. Council raises serious concerns regarding the proposed study corridor.
Municipality of Tweed
OpposesCouncil voted against the northern route. Motion states council does not support the project “at this time” and calls for meaningful consultation and detailed information before any further consideration. Mayor DeGenova stated he is personally against the project as a whole.
Tyendinaga Township
OpposesMotion passed by council, Feb. 18.
Video

“What’s Alto? It’s worse than a bad idea.”

Scott Reid, MP (Lanark-Frontenac) — Alto position statement, Feb. 11, 2026


Source data compiled by Save South Frontenac. Information current as of March 18, 2026. This page is maintained by the Alto HSR Citizen Research Initiative. Links verified March 25, 2026.